Research: Children With Mental Illness Essay

The propose of this paper is to critique an term from the National Association of Social Workers, Inc. The phrase selected is entitle Child bondage redness among women with persistent crude(a) psychological illness. (Hollingsworth, 2004) I selected this clause overdue to its pertinency to chela evasive services which is where my field practicum is taking place. The components of this article argon clearly define and bewildered down into subheadings as followed Abstract, Introduction, Theoretical Framework and look into Design, Method, Analysis, Results, Discussion, Implications for Mental Health Policy and Services, Conclusion, and References. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The layout of the article makes it swooning for the endorser to follow and understand key elements and toll of the inquiry. The title endures a clear cut exposition of what the article is written about as well. The variables are identified and defined under the methods subheading it similarly provides a definition of soulfulnessistic variables, environ intellectual variables, and how child custody is defined for the purposes of this investigate. (Hollingsworth, 2004)The statement of the problem is descriptively explained in the introduction and liveed with statistical compendium provided in the research article. The purpose is clearly defined under the theoretical framework and research be after government agencyitioning explaining that the get a line was to examen the hypothesis which stated that by researching history of child custody loss among women with serious persistent moral illness the custody loss would be higher than those women who did non hurl this type of illness. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The hypothesis and research question provide insight into how the precedent plans to show a correlational statistics and then build effective policies and interventions based upon this raise. The research question asks What are the circumstances under which women wi th voiceless mental illness ache custody of their children? (Hollingsworth,2004) This gives the reader a concise question that allows them to visualize the pedagogy of the research itself. The research question is rapidlyly followed by characteristics that expect been observed among the histrions which define what whitethorn have led to a capture losing custody of her child.The article then provides examples of behavior patterns and socioeconomic factors that may blow the variables mentioned. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The theoretical framework and research section re-states the purpose of this research and also provides supportive in changeion as to why this knowledge is classic to obtain for the hindquarters population mention. The theoretical framework states that the author apply the Human bionomics Theory, which fits the problem presented because at that place is full past information available, and biopsychosocial elements provided to be able to test the hypothesis and provide reliable/mensurable information. (Hollingsworth, 2004) found upon the information in the article the Human Ecology Theory will view the experience with monstrous persistent mental illness in her environment, swear out in predicting out pursues, and also provide mensurable selective information. The info collected will enable social workers and mental wellness workers to connect these women and families to the correct resources so that the mother may regain custody and have access to the resources that she requires.The variables presented appear to be appropriate for the problem as it has been defined. The individuals biopsychosocial information is measurable including whether there is a history of substance abuse and give-and-take for mental illness. The environmental variables are also measurable by gathering data related to the individuals neighborhood, child behavior, poverty conditions, and social support. (Hollingsworth, 2004) It is important to mention that ea ch term used in the variables section was unless defined and a exposition was given as to how the information was considered from these separate groups. The author also recognizes that there are factors besides the mothers mental illness that could play a part in her mental functioning. (Hollingsworth, 2004) I look that it is important for the author to acknowledge these outlying factors that may make for the data that has been collected.The effronterys made in this article include rough bias toward how child restrictive services and the legal organisation will finesse a mother that has persistent severe mental illness. It is not hard to understand why this assumption is made and it is reasonable to behave that the legal system andchild protective services may assume too much based upon a quick assessment of the mothers mental state. I feel that the discrimination based on the research information provided is also related to geographic cranial orbits more than so than ot hers. If there is a low income area that is lacking access to qualified mental wellness professionals it would be safe to assume that child protective services would remove the children since other resources are not available. The overall design of this article is constructed around decimal data with the results of the research organism constructed around this format the author also provides some supportive evidence through qualitative research. The design is appropriate to answer the research questions and providing an easy to follow guide for the readers to brook the information.In my opinion the author also did a good job recognizing different threats to the validity of the data that was collected. The author did this by recognizing what those threats were and how it was accounted for in the data that was collected, and what affect it may have had on the results. The sample endurance was appropriately described and broken down into measurable categories. The author stated P articipants were identified from among those enrolled in a National Institute for Mental Illness funded trine- motion longitudinal study of mothers with severe mental illness. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The author further explains that the sample size began with 379 women after wave 3 of the study 322 women remained. (Hollingsworth, 2004) Women were removed from the study throughout the study depending upon different variables listed as disqualifiers, such as a mother losing custody of her child/children for less than three months.Some women chose to remove themselves from the study and others mazed accomplish with the individuals conducting the study at different times which in turn made the women disqualified. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The process of collecting the data is clearly defined under the method section of the article. The author describes the structure of the questionnaire as a 3 wave longitudinal study. (Hollingsworth, 2004) In my opinion the inconsistencies would come from the participant answering truthfully and consistently inside the 3 wave study. In the 3 wave study the data was collected initially through structured interview questions, with some open-ended questions used, this is where some of the inconsistencies could be from depending on who was analyzing the answers. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The author stated that a lifehistory calendar was included in the 3rd wave to increase accuracy. (Hollingsworth, 2004) Another reflexion would be to note that the participants were paid to participate in the study, still the interview was conducted in the privacy of the participants home. (Hollingsworth, 2004)The interviews were conducted by a trained pistillate interviewer that was racially and ethnically similar to that of the participant. (Hollingsworth, 2004) This is note-worthy because it shows some variables that were not stated as having a possible influence on the results of the data collected. I would take into term that the interviewer, althoug h professionally trained, may have had biases in advance of the participants that were subconsciously conveyed and could have led the participants to answer the interviewer in a particular manner. The results were able to depict what the variables amongst the participants that permanently lost custody of their children and those that did not dawdle custody of their children. One interesting finding is that women that were not get married were more likely to permanently lose custody of their children. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The hypothesis for this provided by the author is that the married women more than likely had more immediate support in the home. (Hollingsworth, 2004)One of the variables listed was the behavior problems from the children of women with persistent mental illness the author notes that in order to narrow down whether this is the children simply reacting to the mothers persistent severe mental illness or whether the children have line up behavioral issues needs to be studied further. (Hollingsworth, 2004) With that being considered the results found that the childrens behavioral issues had little encounter on whether or not the mother lost custody. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The implications recognized are geared toward mental health policy and services the author states that one part of the study that was initially thought of as an individual variable was actually something that could be considered as an environmental factor as well. (Hollingsworth, 2004)The example given was that individual women may not be discriminated against due to be unmarried and this being the cause for their custody loss, but may have lost custody due to less resources than someone who has a partner.(Hollingsworth, 2004) The second famous implication is that individuals with active symptoms of psychosis or depression brook present a significant risk to their children, so the children are removed for theirown protection and not due to discriminatory factors.(Hollin gsworth, 2004)